Science Comunication Through Poetry

Friday, September 28, 2012

Side-effects of Impact Factor in Indian Science

Indian science is increasingly gaining pace. Hundreds of research laboratories, institutes and university departments are producing new science every day. Every scientist is trying to publish his/her research in high impact factor journals, mostly published from the West. High impact factor is increasingly and apparently being accepted as a trademark of high quality research the world over. However, this ‘impact factor’ thing has nothing to do with the actual impact and utility of the science being reported in such journals.

Irrespective of the actual utility, research publications in the so-called high impact factor journals is increasingly becoming the basic criterion for recruitments, promotions and awards/honours in the Indian science institutions. In certain institutions, it is the only most important deciding factor for recruitments, promotions and recognitions of scientists. This trend is actually very disturbing. Now, scientists usually try their best to refrain from all over activities which do not have impact factor. For example, they don’t like to report their research in zero or very low impact factor Indian journals. If they do so, their papers don’t get any value for promotions and recognitions. This, in turn, makes the future of Indian journals highly vulnerable. They don’t write for popular magazines and newspapers for the benefit of the general public. They don’t wish any more, as earlier, to educate the tax payers about their research and its implications on the society. They don’t want to engage with the visitors in their laboratories, as involvement in such activities is not considered for any promotions, incentives or recognitions. They don’t want to waste their time in facing the media while simplifying their science to them. Such public and media involvement activities have no impact factor and so are not so attractive to pull out our scientists from their ivory towers.

Scientists are not showing any interest in taking their research to the masses who are the ultimate users of their science simply because our science policies and the science administrators are not paying any heed to the end-users/consumers of science. This misleading trend has created a callous behaviour in our scientists towards the society. They are increasingly becoming cut-off from the society and so the gap between science and society is now widening at a faster pace. Science popularization is of no use to our self-centric, promotion-oriented and recognition-hungry scientists.

Seriously, when a scientist’s capability and performance is being measured in terms of impact factor, then why he/she should waste time in activities without impact factor. I fear how science administrators can measure scientists’ performance with a simple statistical entity like impact factor. It is making our scientists socially irresponsive and irresponsible.

Scientists are devising new ways for getting more papers in high impact factor journals. Be it publishing the same research in smaller and different fragments or unnecessary self-citation or citing the papers unwantedly from the high impact journals on advice of their editors or face rejection of their paper. All their energy and capabilities are being focused on how to publish more in high impact journals and not in doing research that can have high impact in terms of utility to the society. This trend is also leading to exaggeration of claims or unreplicable results.

There is a need to think beyond impact factor and make the evaluation system of scientists in the Indian science more realistic based on a holistic approach where scientists are not pushed to become factories producing papers meant for publication in high impact factor journals but are considered as socially responsible and responsive personalities doing real science for the benefit of the society.

© Abhay S.D. Rajput, 2012

No comments:

Post a Comment